ASSIGNMENT PAPER NO- 3
v(Literary criticism and Theory)
vTopic- Dryden’s comparative criticism
of Shakespeare, Ben Jonson, Beaumont and Fletcher in “An Essay on dramatic
poesy)
vSubmitted to – Smt.S.B Gardy
Department
of English
v(M.K. University Bhavnagar)
vName- Shital D Italia
vRoll no – 34
vIntroduction
Ø John Dryden was a great restoration poet as
well as critic. He was a versatile writer who left no branches of literature
untouchable. He produce lots of outstanding merits in each field. He was a
poet, prose writer, dramatist and critic also. His works like “An essay on
dramatic poesy”, “Preface and dedication” and “preface to fables” are his chief
contribution to criticism.
Among
them his” Essay on dramatic poesy is regarded as an important landmark in
history of literary criticism. He established himself as a revolutionary
critic. So Dr.Johnson called him “The Father of English criticism”.
Dryden’s contribution.
1)
Progress
and Modernity.
Dryden has deep faith on progress
and modernity .He objects to the pettiness to the roman comic plot. He finds
that roman play lacks in moral instruction in wit, in warmth of love scene. But
at the sometime he admires their plot and regularity of structure. He finds
fault in ancient writers, but considered them to be the best teacher of the modern.
He advocates classical restraint in diction.
2)
Comparative
criticism
Dryden’s comparative criticism theory is proved revolutionary,
before Dryden, most of the classist had been conduct to compare modern
literature with Greek and Latin, because they were regarded as a perfect model
for all time. According to him the critic who accused Shakespeare for his
liberalization in using the dramatic technique had no passion to delve deep in
understanding of Shakespearean style. According to him they might not have
noticed that
“Art is Dynamic
not a static force”
v His originality and Liberalism
Dryden was genius and it is well
expressed in his criticism. He influenced by Aristotle and
Cicero but
he disregards them if they are fentastic.He gives more important to delight
then to instruction in his criticism. He says that,
“Delight is the chief, it
not the end of poesy”
v
John Fletcher
(1579-1625)
He was an English poet
and playwright, although he wrote many works alone and with several different dramatists
he is best known for his collaborative with fellow playwright Francis Beaumont.
Fletcher’s real
talent lay in comedy, especially in the genre of tragicomedy. His style of
tragicomedy at its best manages to generate considerable power the sheer variety
of the emotion it arouses. He is the master of plot and character and used
exaggerated speech for dramatic effect. In the Elizabethan drama we can found generally
ten syllable line while in Fletcher’s play he used 11 lines sometimes 12 syllables.
But the wild appearance of his Drama is that Extravagance language. He is a
highly mannered style.
The hero of Fletcher’
play were preoccupied wit the theme of love or honor or sometime both together.
Fletcher’s particular technical abilities served him well in handling plot of
comic intrigue and his delight.
v
William Shakespeare
(1564-1616)
Dryden remarks on Shakespeare, He ceases to be a classicist
and goes over to the other romantics. Dryden considers him as a “comprehensive
soul”.
In his “essay on Dramatic poesy “he says that Shakespeare he was the man
who of all moderns, and perhaps Ancient poets. All the image of nature was
still present to him, and he drew them not laboriously, but luckily: when he describes
any thing we can see and feel it.
v
Ben Jonson
Ben Jonson was
both a creative and critical writer. He was an English playwright and poet best
known for his satiric comedy “Everyman in his humor” and “Everyman out of
humor”
Dryden believes
that he was most learned and judicious writer which any theater ever had. He
was a most server judge of himself as well as other. One cannot say he wanted
wit, but rather that he was frugal of it. In his critical work “Discoveries” we
may also find three things for the good style i.e.:
To read the
best authors.
To observe
the best speakers.
Has much
exercise of his own style.
Short and sweet....
ReplyDeleteIt's not enough information for this topic. you have to add some more information about this topic. you have to summaries much more information related your topic.
ReplyDelete